Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5484 14
Original file (NR5484 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

70° S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-249(

 

Gy
ty
4

 

Oo
oO
Q
o
ct

i)
Hy
(D
rs
{

 

 

 

Th, * 75 ~ favor on awd - = 5 -oa+ - 5° Aree eer TAT at oie
This 18 in reference to your application for correction oi our
maira) AD maAKA wee11ar +P +} AAI 4 . af Tear 4 ee =
naval record pursuant to the rovisions or 10 SC 1552

-member

 

    

  

 

  

tice were ive
ions and pro ngs of this
Board. Documentary OI St
of your application, tted i:

  

   

concurred with the comme
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names 1d
votes of the members of the panel be 1pO!

   

   

It is regretted that the circumstances are such

that favorable action cannot be taken. ed tc

the Board reconsider its decision upon ew

evidence within one year from the date decision
e C
Docket Ne. NR5484-14

for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,
SI wes * , ma ae

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure: CNPC memo 1780 PERS-312 of 6 Nov 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14

    Original file (NR5899 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7231 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR7231 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR7231-14 3 Mar 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Navai Records EO): Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. Note: Payment of non-disability full...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07908-01

    Original file (07908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of with all subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and II addition, the Board considered the advisory I I~~~I~~oI-;II~~~~II~~ 140013 MMPR 2 of 13 November 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14

    Original file (NR12921 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9941 14

    Original file (NR9941 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 2 eHAperctic ‘ ocr yo BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. Document considered by the Board i of your application, all material submitted in support thereof, your naval 1 applicable statutes, regulations and policies In add considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1 812/0361 dated 19 November 2015, a copy of which is att 3 contained in the review oi your military records, nothing was...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00156

    Original file (FD2004-00156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ii . .,"':"','' 4. ,,,, '...,,, , , ,s x-.%:!fiEc$%. ~ ~ , g P : : ~ , % ORDER APPOINTNG THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERFONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 1 Case heard at Washington, D C Advise applicant of the decision ofthe Board, the right to a personal appearance withiwithout counsel, and the right...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14

    Original file (NR6761 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    )¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4447 14

    Original file (NR4447 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4447-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7384 14

    Original file (NR7384 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a nsidered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo January 2015, a copy of which is attacne It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision. NR7384-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14

    Original file (NR6441 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...